关闭
 
读者在线:用户名 密码
首页 期刊简介 投稿须知 期刊目录 专家风采 编委会 特邀顾问 联系我们 移动出版
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5



刊物信息

期刊名称:药物分析杂志
主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国药学会
承办:中国食品药品检定研究院
主编:金少鸿
地址:北京天坛西里2号
邮政编码:100050
电话:010-67012819,67058427
电子邮箱:ywfx@nifdc.org.cn
国际标准刊号:ISSN 0254-1793
国内统一刊号:CN 11-2224/R
邮发代号:2-237
 

访问统计
您是第  1 0 2 2 5 5 3 4 位浏览者
您当前的位置:首页 >> 正文

茵栀黄注射液中助溶剂葡甲胺2种含量测定方法比较

Comparison of the determination method of meglumine as cosolvent in Yinzhihuang injection

分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2011,31 (6):0-0
DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2017.01.01
-----摘要:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

目的: 建立并比较2种测定茵栀黄注射液中助溶剂葡甲胺含量的方法。 方法: 分别采用高效液相色谱-质谱联用法和亲水相互作用色谱法测定茵栀黄注射液中葡甲胺的含量。液质联用法以氨基葡萄糖为内标,采用Shim-pak VP-ODS(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm)色谱柱,流动相为甲醇-0.1%甲酸溶液(35∶ 65),大气压化学离子化,选择性正离子方式检测。亲水相互作用色谱法采用Waters XBridge Amide(4.6 mm×150 mm,3.5 μm)色谱柱,流动相为甲醇-0.05 mol·mL-1乙酸铵溶液(95∶ 5),蒸发光散射检测器检测。 结果: 2种方法测定葡甲胺的线性关系均良好,均具有较强的专属性和重复性,平均回收率分别为100.2%和98.8%。 结论: 2种方法均可作为茵栀黄注射液中葡甲胺的含量测定方法,但各有优势。

-----英文摘要:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Objective: To establish and compare two methods for determination of meglumine as cosolvent in Yinzhihuang injection. Method: LC-APCI-MS/MS and HILIC-ELSD were utilized to determine the content of meglumine in Yinzhihuang injection respectively.Gglucosamine was used as internal standard in LC-APCI-MS/MS.The separation was carried out on an Shim-pak VP-ODS column(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm)with the mobile phase consisted of methanol-0.1% formic acid (35∶ 65)(v/v).The detection was performed on a trip-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) scan mode via atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI).A Waters XBridge Amide column(4.6 mm×150 mm,3.5 μm)was adopted with mobile phase of methanol-0.05 mol·mL-1 ammonium acetate (95∶ 5) (v/v) and evaporated light scattering detector was used in HILIC-ELSD. Results: The two methods were all specific and the linear correlation and repeatability were all well for them.The average recovery were 100.2% and 98.8%,respectively. Conclusion: Both methods can be used to control the quality of meglumine as cosolvent in traditional Chinese medicine injections.But each has both advantages and disadvantages.

-----参考文献:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

欢迎阅读《药物分析杂志》!您是该文第 1566位读者!

药物分析杂志 © 2009
地址:北京天坛西里2号 邮政编码:100050; 电子邮件:ywfx@nicpbp.org.cn