关闭
 
读者在线:用户名 密码
首页 期刊简介 投稿须知 期刊目录 专家风采 编委会 特邀顾问 联系我们 移动出版
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5



刊物信息

期刊名称:药物分析杂志
主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国药学会
承办:中国食品药品检定研究院
主编:金少鸿
地址:北京天坛西里2号
邮政编码:100050
电话:010-67012819,67058427
电子邮箱:ywfx@nifdc.org.cn
国际标准刊号:ISSN 0254-1793
国内统一刊号:CN 11-2224/R
邮发代号:2-237
 

访问统计
您是第  1 0 5 2 7 8 0 5 位浏览者
您当前的位置:首页 >> 正文

去细胞异种角膜基质与去细胞异种结膜基质的免疫原性研究

Immunogenicity evaluation of acellular xenogeneic corneal matrix and acellular xenogeneic conjunctival matrix

分类号:R917
出版年·卷·期(页码):2019,39 (8):1362-1369
DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2017.01.01
-----摘要:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

目的:应用Gal抗原缺失小鼠从体液免疫、细胞免疫、植入物局部组织病理等多方面评价去细胞异种角膜基质(猪源)与去细胞异种结膜基质(猪源)的免疫原性。方法:将用于每种材料的小鼠分为3个实验组:对照组(Con)、原材料组(T1)和基质组(T2)。将去细胞异种角膜基质与去细胞异种结膜基质及其原材料植入经兔血红细胞2次预免疫的Gal抗原缺失小鼠体内,于植入1个月后取材,分别分析2种基质及其原材料组与对照组在小鼠血清总抗体、抗-Gal抗体、细胞因子,脾脏淋巴细胞不同亚型的细胞表面分子表达水平,以及植入物局部组织病理等方面的变化。结果:2种基质及其原材料组在植入1个月后小鼠血清总抗体含量、细胞因子含量与对照组相比均无显著性差异。少数脾脏淋巴细胞表面分子表达水平与对照组相比有显著性差异(P<0.05),但均在对照组历史数据变异范围内。然而,小鼠血清抗gal抗体检测结果显示:去细胞异种结膜基质植入1个月时基质及其原材料组小鼠血清抗-gal抗体水平比对照组显著升高(P<0.05);而去细胞异种角膜基质植入1个月时基质及其原材料组小鼠血清抗-gal抗体水平与对照组相比均无显著性差异。植入物局部组织病理显示:去细胞异种结膜基质植入1个月时大部分已降解,组织学显示轻微炎症反应,原材料组已无材料残留,组织学显示无明显炎症反应。去细胞异种角膜基质及原材料组植入1个月时植入物未发生明显降解,基质及原材料组的组织学反应均为重度炎症反应。结论:本研究结果证实了Gal抗原缺失小鼠对材料中残留Gal抗原的敏感性,应用Gal抗原小鼠能够科学地评价动物源性生物材料的异种免疫原性风险。

-----英文摘要:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Objective: To evaluate the immunogenicity of acellular xenogeneic corneal matrix (pig sourced)and acellular xenogeneic conjunctival matrix (pig sourced)based on Gal antigen-deficient mice through humoral immunity, cellular immunity and local histopathology. Methods: Mice for each material were divided into three groups:control group (Con), raw material group (T1)and matrix group (T2). Acellular xenogeneic corneal matrix, acellular xenogeneic conjunctival matrix, and their raw materials were implanted into Gal antigen-deficient mice, which were twice pre-immunized with rabbit red blood cells (RRBC). The tissues were collected after 1 month, and the serum total antibody content, serum anti-Gal antibody level, serum cytokines content, levels of spleen lymphocytes cell expressing different surface antigens, and the histopathology of local tissues implanted with materials were analyzed respectively. Results: There was no significant difference in serum total antibody content and cytokine content between both matrix and their raw material groups compared with the control group post 1 month implantation. The expression levels of a few spleen lymphocytes surface antigens were significantly different from those of the control group (P<0.05), but all of them were within the range of historical data variation in the control group without biological significance. For acellular xenogeneic conjunctival matrix, the results of serum anti-gal antibody in the raw material and matrix group were significantly higher than that in the control group post-1 month implantation (P<0.05). However, for acellular xenogeneic corneal matrix, there was no significant difference in serum anti-gal antibody levels in the raw material group or the matrix group compared with the control group post-1 month implantation. The histopathology data showed that most of the materials were degraded in the acellular xenogeneic conjunctival matrix group post-1 month implantation, and accompanied by a slight inflammation, and in the raw material group, materials were completely degraded and there was no obvious inflammation. For acellular xenogeneic corneal matrix, the implants had no obvious degradation, and accompanied by severe inflammation in both matrix and raw material groups post-1 month implantation. Conclusion: The results of this study confirmed the sensitivity of Gal antigen deficient mice to residual Gal antigen in materials, and the xenogeneic immunogenicity risk of animal-derived biomaterials can be scientifically evaluated by using Gal antigen deficient mice.

-----参考文献:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] TAHVILDARI M, OMOTO M, CHEN Y, et al. In vivo expansion of regulatory T cells by low-dose interleukin-2 treatment increases allograft survival in corneal transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 2016, 100(3):525
[2] 王斌,李长兵.深板层角膜移植治疗角膜病的临床观察[J].国际眼科杂志, 2012, 12(12):2394 WANG B, LI CB. Clinical observation of deeper lamellar keratoplasty in the treatment of keratopathy[J]. Int Eye Sci,2012, 12(12):2394
[3] ORMEROD LD, FONG LP, FOSTER CS. Corneal infection in mucosal scarring disorders and Sjogren's syndrome[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,1988, 105:512
[4] CHOI HJ, KIM MK, LEE HJ, et al. Effect of αGal on corneal xenotransplantation in a mouse model[J]. Xenotransplantation, 2011, 18(3):176
[5] 霍银平,周利晓,孙成林.脱细胞猪角膜基质支架的制备及其生物相容性[J].中国组织工程研究,2016, 20(30):4449 HUO YP, ZHOU LX, SUN CL. Preparation of an acellular porcine corneal stroma scaffold and its biocompatibility[J]. Chin J Tissue Engine Res,2016, 20(30):4449
[6] 江音.异种脱细胞结膜基质移植修复兔结膜缺损的实验研究[D].济南:济南大学, 2016 JIANG Y. Xenogeneic Transplantation of Acellular Conjunctiva Matrix for Rabbit Conjunctival Defect[D]. Jinan:Jinan University, 2016
[7] YY/T0771.1-2009风险管理应用[S]. 2009 YY/T0771.1-2009 Application of Risk Management[S]. 2009
[8] GALILI U, SHOHET SB, KOBRIN E, et al. Man, apes, and old world monkeys differ from other mammals in the expression of alphagalactosyl epitomes on nucleated cells[J]. J Biol Chem,1988, 263(33):17755
[9] MILLAND J, CHRISTIANSEN D, LARURUS BD, et al. The molecular basis for galalpha (1, 3)gal expression in animals with a deletion of the alpha 1,3 galactosyltransferase gene[J]. J Immunol, 2006, 176(4):2448
[10] TAYLOR SG, MCKENZIE IF, SANDRIN MS. Characterization of the rat alpha(1, 3)galactosyltransferase:evidence for two independent genes encoding glycosyltransferases that synthesize Gal alpha(1, 3)Gal by two separate glycosylation pathways[J]. Glycobiology,2003, 13(5):327
[11] GALILI U, SWANSON K. Gene sequences suggest inactivation of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase in catarrhines after the divergence of apes from monkeys[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1991,88(16):7401
[12] GALILI U, MACHER BA, BUEHLER J, et al. Human natural anti alpha-galactosyl IgG. Ⅱ. The specific recognition of α(1, 3)-linked galactose residues[J]. Exp Med,1985, 162(2):573
[13] GOOD AH, COOPER DK, MALCOLM AJ, et al. Identification of carbohydrate structures that bind human antiporcine antibodies:implications fordiscordant xenografting in humans[J]. Transplant Proc,1992, 24(2):559
[14] SHAO AL, LING Y, XU L, et al. Xenogeneic bone matrix immune risk assessment using GGTA1 knockout mice[J]. Artif Cell Nanomed B,2018,Sup3:S359
[15] 邵安良,魏利娜,范昌发,等. Gal抗原缺失小鼠的应用示范:动物源性硬脑膜补片的免疫原性反应评价[J].药物分析杂志, 2018,38(8):1296 SHAO AL,WEI LN,FAN CF,et al. The application of Gal antigendeficient mice:evaluation of the immunogenicity of endocranium patch derived from anmal tissues[J]. Chin J Pharm Anal,2018, 38(8):1296
[16] GALILI U, LATEMPLE DC, RADIC MZ. A sensitive assay for measuring alpha-Gal epitope expression on cells by a monoclonal anti-Gal antibody[J]. Transplantation,1998, 65:1129
[17] 邵安良,魏利娜,范昌发,等. 2种Gal抗原缺失小鼠的免疫学特性比较研究[J].药物分析杂志, 2018, 38(8):1288 SHAO AL, WEI LN, FAN CF, et al. Comparative study on the immunological properties between two types of Gal antigen-deficient mice[J]. Chin J Pharm Anal,2018, 38(8):1288
[18] 王智崇,葛坚,徐锦堂,等.角膜不同组织免疫原性分析[J],中华眼科杂志,2002, 38(9):535 WANG ZC, GE J, XU JT, et al. Relative quantitative analysis of corneal immunogenicity[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol,2002,38(9):535
[19] 罗小玲,徐锦堂,江振友,等.异种角膜基质异位移植对大鼠外周血T细胞亚群的影响[J].中国病理生理杂志,2004, 20(4):613 LONG XL, XU JT, JIANG ZY, et al. Effects of allocorneal matrix heterotopic transplantation on T cell subsets in peripheral blood of rats[J]. Chin J Pathophys,2004, 20(4):613
[20] SHARIFI R, YANG Y, ADIBNIA Y. Finding an optimal corneal xenograft using comparative analysis of corneal matrix proteins across species[J]. Sci Rep-UK,2019(9), DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-38342-4

欢迎阅读《药物分析杂志》!您是该文第 896位读者!

药物分析杂志 © 2009
地址:北京天坛西里2号 邮政编码:100050; 电子邮件:ywfx@nicpbp.org.cn