关闭
 
读者在线:用户名 密码
首页 期刊简介 投稿须知 期刊目录 专家风采 编委会 特邀顾问 联系我们 移动出版
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5



刊物信息

期刊名称:药物分析杂志
主管单位:中国科学技术协会
主办单位:中国药学会
承办:中国食品药品检定研究院
主编:金少鸿
地址:北京天坛西里2号
邮政编码:100050
电话:010-67012819,67058427
电子邮箱:ywfx@nifdc.org.cn
国际标准刊号:ISSN 0254-1793
国内统一刊号:CN 11-2224/R
邮发代号:2-237
 

访问统计
您是第  1 2 3 0 9 4 3 0 位浏览者
您当前的位置:首页 >> 正文

相对差异基础上的生物相似性评估标准

A criterion of assessing biosimilarity based-on the relative difference

分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2015,35 (5):0-0
DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2017.01.01
-----摘要:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

为了检测仿制生物制品与其原研生物制品的相似性,目前主要采用基于相对差异指标的统计方法进行评价。常用的统计推断主要基于双序列(two-sequence)、双周期(two-period)的交叉设计,或者在忽略原研药批次间变异情况下的双臂平行设计。本文采用三臂平行设计(three-arm parallel design),分别测定仿制生物制品与原研生物制品的绝对差异,原研生物制品不同批次间的绝对差异,并通过该两绝对差异之比来评价仿制生物制品与原研生物制品的生物相似性概率(biosimilar probability)。这种基于生物相似性概率的评价标准,在大样本下具有渐进正态的性质,给出了检验的功效和临床试验中样本量的计算公式。本文通过模拟研究和样本量估算,证明了生物相似性概率的统计检验法具有良好的检验效能。

-----英文摘要:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Currently for the sake of testing biosimilarity between an innovative biological drug product and a follow-on biologics, some statistical methods are considered based on the relative distance criteria, commonly statistical inferences under a two-sequence, two-period(2×2)crossover design or a two-arm parallel design ignoring the variability of the innovative products among different batches.In this article we consider to assess the biosimilarity between a biosimilar product and an innovative biological drug product under the three-arm parallel design, one absolute difference from the biosimilars and the innovative biological drug product, the other between the two innovative products from different batches.The statistical test is developed based on biosimilar probability, the new criterion of assessing biosimilarity displayed the good asymptotic properties under large sample size, the test power and the calculation of sample size are obtained.By the simulation the good performance of the proposed assessing method is shown.

-----参考文献:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] EMEA.HMP/437/04BiologicalMedicinal Product[S].2005
[2] CHOW SC, LIU JP.Design and Analysis of Boavailability and Bioequivalence Studies[M].3rd ed.New York:Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, 2008
[3] FDA.Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research[S].2010
[4] TSE SK, CHANG YJ, SU WL, et al.Statistical qualitycontrol process for traditional Chinese medicine[J].J Biopharm Stat, 2006, 16(6):861
[5] TSOU HH, JAMES HH, CHEN YM, et al.Establishing consistency across all regions in a multi-regional clinical trial[J].Pharm Stat, 2012, 11(4):295
[6] TSOU HH, CHIEN TY, LIU JP, et al.A consistency approach to evaluation of bridging studies and multi-regional trials[J].Stat Med, 2011, 30(4), 2171
[7] CHOW SC, HSIEH TC, CHI E, et al.A comparison of moment-based and probability-based criteria for assessment of follow-on biologics[J].J Biopharm Stat, 2010, 30(5):31
[8] KANG SH, CHOW SC.Statistical assessment of biosimilarity based on relative distance between follow-on biologics[J].Stat Med, 2013, 32(3):382

欢迎阅读《药物分析杂志》!您是该文第 940位读者!

药物分析杂志 © 2009
地址:北京天坛西里2号 邮政编码:100050; 电子邮件:ywfx@nicpbp.org.cn