2种测定TNK-tPA生物学活性测定方法的比对分析
Comparative analysis to two biological activity detecting methods of TNK-tPA
分类号:R917
出版年·卷·期(页码):2018,38 (12):2213-2217
DOI:
10.16155/j.0254-1793.2017.01.01
-----摘要:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
目的:应用2种溶栓活性检测方法检测重组人组织型纤溶酶原激活剂TNK突变体(recombinant TNK mutant of human tissue-type plasminogen activator,TNK-tPA)生物学活性并统计分析两者结果是否一致。方法:采用纤维蛋白平板溶圈法和气泡上升法测定TNK-tPA生物学活性,并对结果进行统计分析。结果:纤维蛋白平板溶圈法测定结果几何均数为2.89×104 IU·支-1,气泡上升法测定结果几何均数为2.95×104 IU·支-1。经t检验分析,2种方法检测结果无显著性差异(P>0.05)。经置换检验(permutation test)分析,2种方法检测结果数据相当(接受度概率约为90%)。结论:2种方法均可用于实验室的常规检验,但建议对于TNK-tPA的生物学活性检测使用气泡上升法。
-----英文摘要:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Objective: Two thrombolytic activity methods of recombinant human tissue type plasminogen activator mutant(TNK-tPA) were carried out and the results were analyzed to deduce if the results were similar. Methods: The biological activity of TNK-tPA was determined by dissolution-ring method and bubble-rising method,and the results were analyzed statistically. Results: The geometric mean of dissolution-ring method was 2.89×104 IUper vial and the geometric mean of bubble-rising method was 2.95×104 IUper vial. T test analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two methods(P >0.05). According to permutation test,the data of the two methods were similar to each other(acceptance probability was about 90%). Conclusion: The both two methods can be used for routine laboratory tests.But the bubble-rising method was used for detecting the biological activity of TNK-tPA.
-----参考文献:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
欢迎阅读《药物分析杂志》!您是该文第 725位读者!